Edit
Retailers

Aldi Outperforms Grocers in Planned Spending: RFG Supermarket Experience Study

While conventional supermarkets receive the strongest marks in quality and variety, hard discounter Aldi has a decided advantage in value for the money and a slight edge in the checkout experience, according to the Retail Feedback Group’s 2017 U.S. Supermarket Experience Study.

Millennials gave lower ratings than older shoppers in every aspect of the supermarket visit, the study, now in its 10th year, added. More key findings are below:

Aldi Making Inroads While Walmart Scores Lowest

Shoppers who visited an Aldi in the last 60 days are more likely to recommend the store (4.54 on a five-point scale) than supermarket shoppers, who give an average rating of (3.66). Further, 33% of those who shopped at Aldi say they plan to shop there more than now in the next 12 months versus 21% for supermarket shoppers and just 10% for Walmart.

 In core experience ratings, Aldi shoppers give value for money the highest marks (4.68), and also score Aldi higher than supermarkets on checkout speed (4.30). Walmart shoppers give lower scores on the all the core experience factors.

Overall Satisfaction Lower During Prime Selling Time

Supermarket shoppers gave an overall satisfaction (OSAT) rating of 4.42 on a 5-point scale before 3 p.m., but this mark fell to 4.36 between 3 p.m. and 7 p.m. Several factor ratings were substantially lower after 3 p.m. than earlier in the day, including cleanliness, quality/freshness, staff friendliness, and value for the money.

Supermarkets Strong in Quality and Cleanliness but Moderate in Customer Service

Supermarket shoppers rated quality/freshness of the food and groceries (4.45) and cleanliness of the store (4.40) as the two strongest core experience factors. Associate friendliness – the highest-rated service factor – received a more moderate rating of 4.34, followed by associate helpfulness/knowledge (4.24), checkout speed/efficiency (4.23) and associate availability (4.19).

 Opportunity to Improve in Variety in Emerging Categories

While supermarkets score well on general variety and selection (4.38), scores register lower on natural and organic items (4.05), ethnic/international products (3.97), allergen-free items (3.97) and locally-sourced items (3.96).

Low Value Rating but High Marks for Advertised Sale Items

Receiving the lowest score among all core experience factors, value for the money spent on this visit registered at 4.18. Drilling down deeper, the results show meat prices (3.98), produce prices (4.03) and everyday prices (4.03) all generated low scores in the supermarket channel, while advertised sales items scored much higher (4.38). Note that 76% of shoppers refer to one or more advertising/sales vehicles – traditional, social, mobile and digital – before or during the visit.

“These survey findings point to a critical need for grocery retailers with a physical presence to step up their game," noted Doug Madenberg, RFG principal. "When people shop in a supermarket, the overall experience, assortment, and value proposition need to be excellent in order to earn their next visit. There are too many grocery options available online, in hard discount stores, and across other formats, for an average or sub-par supermarket visit to be acceptable.”

 Millennials Give Supermarkets Low Marks on All Core Experience Factors

Millennials scored supermarkets the lowest on all core experience factors, as well as overall trip satisfaction. Boomers, on the other hand, rated overall trip experience and nearly all core experience factors highest (and only one area – staff knowledge/helpfulness—was rated equal by both boomers and Gen X).

Brian Numainville, RFG Principal, observed, “The fact that overall trip satisfaction and all of the core experience factors register lowest among millennials should be a call to action for supermarkets. Traditional supermarkets must find ways to make the supermarket more appealing and relevant to younger shoppers or risk becoming endangered as boomers age and purchase less.”

Meal Kit Usage andExperience

Overall, just 14% of all supermarket shoppers tried a meal kit delivery service in the last year, but millennials showed stronger trial versus Gen X or boomers.

Blue Apron, Home Chef and Hello Fresh were the three services used most. Top reasons for meal kit usage were home delivery (46%) and to save time (45%). Of those who did not use a meal kit, the main reasons were that they were too expensive (48%) or there was no interest in meal kits (44%). Meal kit users were most satisfied with quality of ingredients (83% highly satisfied) and least impressed with value for the money spent (65% highly satisfied). Overall, 15% of shoppers also indicated their primary supermarket has a meal kit offering. Of those who purchased a meal kit from their primary supermarket, the top reasons given were good value (54%), quality of ingredients (53%) and to save time (51%).

The study is based on a nationally representative study of 1,200 supermarket shoppers.

For more information, contact report@retailfeedback.com.

Trending

More from our partners